Evidences of Case “Atlantic Council”

CASE 46-2018: Atlantic Council

By Master Yan Maitri-Shi, Prosecutor

 

HONORABLE JURY OF INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST ETHICS COMMITTEE (IBEC) & BUDDHIST TRIBUNAL ON HUMAN RIGHTS (BTHR)

After Legitimating and Validating Evidences and Charges by Master Maitreya, President and Spiritual Judge of IBEC-BTHR, it is addressed the case against the accused party, Atlantic Council. This investigation was initiated from the Cases of Myanmar, Argentina & United Nations (UN).

The Charges by which the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights is accusing Atlantic Council are enumerated below:

  • Complicity with Human Rights Violations
  • Complicity with Crimes against Peace and Liberty
  • Unethical Leadership

 

The procedure established in the Statute of INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST ETHICS  COMMITTEE & BUDDHIST TRIBUNAL ON HUMAN RIGHTS provides both bodies the ostentation to enjoy independence and liberty from state and national regulation and control, besides having the legality and acting as a Buddhist People in order to assert its customs, traditions, practices, procedures, judgments and rights as well as acting in pursuit of the development of Spirituality, of Buddhist Ethics, and of the defense of International Human Rights. This procedure has the particularity, singularity and distinction of having “Special Jurisdiction of the Tribal Law” and “Universal Jurisdiction of the International Law”, thus having the Character, Juridical validity, Legal Powers, infrastructure, Training and Capability necessary to be Actor, Administrator and Executor of Justice in this realm and exercise, by judging of the Accused by means of an Ethical Judgment whose Purpose is Truth, Reconciliation and Learning.-

Therefore, it is detailed a series of EVIDENCES that support the Charges referred so that the Jury members decide about the possible “Responsibility”, “Innocence” or “Insanity” of the accused. Such evidence come from graphic and audiovisual media that have been gathered, sorted and confirmed in their order and context as Means of Proof in order to know, establish, dictate and determine the Responsibility of the Accused for committing the aforementioned Charges.

 

 

PRESENTATION OF THE CASE

The Organization called ATLANTIC COUNCIL has given several awards to leaders and politicians who have already been investigated and sentenced by the Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights. By maintaining such awards, there is obviously a direct endorsement by the Atlantic Council regarding the actions of these criminal leaders. This case is special since the complete list of the evidence comes almost entirely from the Buddhist Tribunal’s jurisprudence.

 

Evidence 1: Aung San Suu Kyi (Myanmar)

Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights: The ATLANTIC COUNCIL delivered the GLOBAL CITIZEN AWARD[1] to Aung San Suu Kyi in 2012. However, in Case 02-2015, Aung San Suu Kyi was declared by the Buddhist Tribunal to be Responsible for having committed Genocide, Ethnic cleansing, Crimes against humanity, High Crimes against Peace, Violation of the International Human Rights Law, Violation of Buddhist Law, High Crimes against women and childhood, War Crimes, Supreme Offense against International Morality and Sanctity of Life, Extermination, Violations of International Humanitarian Law, Attack on Democracy, Violation of Civil and Political Rights, Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and State Terrorism.

 

Evidence 2: Mauricio Macri (Argentina)

Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights: El ATLANTIC COUNCIL delivered in 2018 the GLOBAL CITIZEN AWARD [2] to Mauricio Macri. However, in Case 10-2015, Mauricio Macri was declared by the Buddhist Tribunal as Responsible for having committed Crimes against Humanity, Violations of Human Rights, Violation of the Rights of Tribal Peoples, Ecocide and Corruption.

 

Evidence 3: Shinzo Abe (Japan)

Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights: The ATLANTIC COUNCIL in 2016 delivered the GLOBAL CITIZEN AWARD [3] to Shinzo Abe. However, in Case 40-2018, Shinzo Abe was declared by the Buddhist Tribunal a Responsible for having committed Ecocide, Crimes against Nature, Violation of International Law, Violation of Buddhist Law, and Violation of the Right to Sustainable Development and Healthy Environment.

 

Evidence 4: Christine Lagarde (IMF)

Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights: The ATLANTIC COUNCIL delivered in 2011 the GLOBAL CITIZEN AWARD [4] to Christine Lagarde. However, in the courts of France, Christine Lagarde was declared Responsible for having committed Negligence (negligence by a person in a position of public authority).

 

Evidence 5: George W. Bush junior (USA)

Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights: The ATLANTIC COUNCIL delivered in 2018 the DISTINGUISHED LEADERSHIP AWARD [5]  to George W Bush. However, in Case 20-2016, George W Bush Junior was investigated by the Buddhist Tribunal as Responsible for committing acts of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity in Iraq. In addition, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission sentenced George W Bush junior as Responsible for crimes against peace and war crimes.

 

Evidence 6: Tony Blair (UK)

Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights: The ATLANTIC COUNCIL in 2008 delivered the DISTINGUISHED LEADERSHIP AWARD [6]  to Tony Blair. However, in Case 20-2016, Tony Blair was investigated by the Buddhist Tribunal as Responsible for having committed acts of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity in Iraq. In addition, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission sentenced Tony Blair as Responsible for War Crimes.

 

Evidence 7: Ban Ki-moon (United Nations)

Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights: The ATLANTIC COUNCIL in 2012 delivered the DISTINGUISHED LEADERSHIP AWARD [7]  to Ban Ki-moon. However, in Case 20-2016, Ban Ki-moon was sentenced by the Buddhist Tribunal as Responsible for having committed GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, WAR CRIMES, CORRUPTION, VIOLATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, HIGH CRIMES AGAINST WORLD PEACE, HIGH VIOLATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN AND WOMEN, SUPREME OFFENSE AGAINST INTERNATIONAL MORALITY AND THE SANCTITY OF LIFE, VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, VIOLATION OF CANON LAW, VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST LAW and INFANTICIDE.

 

Evidence 8: Madeleine Albright (USA)

Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights: The ATLANTIC COUNCIL in 2018 delivered the FREEDOM AWARDS [8]  to Madeleine Albright. However, in Case 20-2016, Madeleine Albright was investigated by the Buddhist Tribunal as Responsible for having committed acts of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity in Iraq.

 

 

[1] http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/events/global-citizen-awards

[2] http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/events/global-citizen-awards

[3] http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/events/global-citizen-awards

[4] http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/events/global-citizen-awards

[5] http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/events/distinguished-leadership-awards

[6] http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/events/distinguished-leadership-awards

[7] http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/events/distinguished-leadership-awards

[8] http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/events/freedom-awards

One thought on “Evidences of Case “Atlantic Council”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s